Beasties
Set in 1765 France and based on the historical legend
of the Beast of Gévaudan, Christophe Gans'
Brotherhood of the Wolf (Le pacte des
loups) is a huge, ballsy spectacle, especially by
French standards. As such, it's a welcome rejoinder to
the Amelie juggernaut -- a movie with big,
messy politics, lots of action and anger, and a
wide-ranging disdain for the "French" clichés so gaily
embraced by Jeunet's film. For its anti-Amelie
attitude alone, Brotherhood is cause for
celebration: vive les loups.
There are other reasons to like Brotherhood of the
Wolf (its slambanging fight choreography, Vincent
Cassel's disquieting turn as a villain), as well as
reasons to complain (its conceptual laziness regarding
gender and race stereotypes), but its most striking
aspect is its crazy mishmash of generic and cultural
fragments -- French costume drama, monster movie
mayhem, murky hallucinations, Hong Kong action, kung
fu wirework, swords and flintlock rifles, busty whores
and peasant girls looking after lambs. And oh yes,
lots of blood and heaving bosoms, as the plot centers
on the hunt for a horrible wolf-like monster that
kills some 100 women and children (this part of the
legend speaks to social and political circumstances,
no doubt). The film's $29 million cost (meager by
Hollywood standards) is everywhere on the screen: in
the vast landscapes, lush interiors, detailed
costumes, elaborate animatronic and digital beasties
(by Jim Henson's Creature Shop, but entirely
uncuddly), and speedy, extremely mobile camerawork.
Along with its splashy surface, Brotherhood
also cooks up a bit of class analysis, with the Beast
signifying the brutality and decadence that brought on
the French Revolution. Like the Hughes' brothers'
From Hell, Brotherhood indicts the
privileged folks in rather elaborate fashion. Not only
are they selfish and clueless, they're also generally
dismissive of the poor, starving peasants who are the
Beast's primary targets. Apparently, this has to do
with access and vulnerability -- the farmers and
herders are out in the open, easy prey. It also has to
do with a baleful plot involving the cultish and
grand-robe-wearing "Brotherhood." (Think: Eyes Wide
Shut or The Ninth Gate. Been there already,
and recently.) In other words, the Beast makes the
systemic abuses of the time literal, as well as
sensational and legendary. Such abuses were, of
course, already fairly literal and sensational, but
the Beast ups that fantastic ante, being gigantic and
alarmingly agile, with razor-sharp scales on its back
and iron fangs.
As in most horror films, the details of the monster's
form don't become visible until about 90 minutes in.
And until then, you hear a lot about the Beast,
in the form of survivors and witnesses' testimonies,
and recollection by the narrator, Thomas Age (Jacques
Perrin). As the film begins in 1794, Thomas, an
aristocrat, is on his way out the door to be
guillotined, courtesy of the French Revolution. This
metaphorical point (linking the Beast and the
guillotine) isn't quite so blunt-instrumental as it
sounds, for Thomas is a "good" aristocrat (the real
life figure on whom he's based was apparently saved
from death by his servants). More importantly here,
Thomas -- or rather, his younger self, played by
Jeremie Renier (La Promesse and Criminal
Lovers) -- is one of the Beast's well-intentioned
hunters.
Thomas's story begins spectacularly, as the Beast
ravages a voluptuous woman out in the countryside, and
though the Beast remains a sinister, Jaws-like shadow,
the tearing flesh and breaking bones are plenty
explicit. Enter the hero, a specialist dispatched by
Louis XV to take care of this increasing blight on his
reputation (it can't look right to have your subjects
splattered about the land). The dashing Fronsac
(Samuel Le Bihan) is a "naturalist," which means he's
sort of a philosopher, sort of a scientist, and
equally skilled in weaponry, taxidermy, and affairs of
the boudoir. Fronsac's many talents make him an
immediate target for the effete men who make up
Gévaudan's authorities and kibitzers, including the
requisite sneaky priest (Jean-Francois Stevenin) and
the one-armed, resentful young aristocrat Jean
Francois (Cassel).
Fronsac conducts his investigation with the help of
his loyal buddy, Mani (Hawaiian-born martial arts star
Marc Dacascos). A mystical-minded Iroquois warrior
whom Fronsac picked up during his adventures in the
New World, Mani is something of a novelty in France,
where everyone assumes he's Fronsac's valet. Their
ignorance enhances Fronsac's cool quotient, since he
appreciates and even practices some of Mani's
hallucinogenic rituals. The men are clearly devoted to
one another, but the film makes specific use of Mani.
Not only is he the token Other of Color and Emblem of
America (wild, innocent, confident), he's also the
smoothest ass-kicker in sight.
Just so, Mani must deal with the doubters. As in any
Steven Seagal movie, the local overweening goons
(here, cops or gypsies) challenge the foreigner, but
Mani repeatedly outclasses them in technique and
manner. With such obviously debauched opponents, Mani
doesn't have to do much to win your sympathy, but he
goes through the "noble savage" routine anyway,
communing with nature and running about nearly naked
so as to show off his excellent tats. As a party
trick, he intuits guests' animal "totems." His own is
the wolf, which means that he's less than pleased by a
massive hunting expedition that results in a pile of
wolf corpses -- poor Mani looks so sad. This affinity
for wolves aligns Mani with the Beast (who is sort of
a tricked-out wolflike animal), as they are both
victims of and outsiders to the European "civilized"
culture.
Mani exhibits his own kind of civility, with his
graceful (hard) body and long flowing hair highlighted
in several running-through-the woods shots. Mani's
hyper-virility -- so lean, so inscrutable, and so dark
-- eventually provides a model for Fronsac's climactic
battle with the Beast. But until then, Fronsac
displays his potency in the more usual ways --
shooting his gun and chasing skirts. When he's not
busy wooing Jean Francois's sister Marianne (Emilie
Dequenne), who is truly a vision in her smart red
hunting outfit, astride her big steamy horse, he's
down at the brothel, letting the mysterious Madame
Sylvia (Monica Bellucci) play with her knife all over
him.
Yet, for all his hetero activity, Fronsac and Mani's
buddy bond is paramount, and young Thomas observes it
keenly, eager to get a piece of the Beast-killing
action. If Brotherhood doesn't quite explore
all the possibilities of this lively homosocial
dynamic, suffice it to say that pursuing the Beast
involves frequent penetrations and spurting fluids.
Fronsac, being the hero, is destined to be with
Marianne, of course (though not until she suffers a
very, very nasty episode herself). But the happily
ever after part is not even shown on screen, as the
film is obviously much more interested in the
transformation Fronsac must undergo to fit into such a
sanctioned relationship.
This transformation occurs in his encounter with the
Beast, as it represents the volatile combinations of
sex and violence, religious dogma and emerging
industrialism, and as it enables Fronsac to see
variously unpleasant sides of his culture, his
science, and himself. Brotherhood is loaded
with inflated metaphors and generic clichés, but it
does deliver great action and it does wrestle with
ideas, some of them rather ugly.