Selling pond scum
The Kate & Leopold that opens on Christmas day
is a romantic comedy with a slight technical twist:
the two people destined to be together come from
different centuries. Kate (Meg Ryan) is a 21st-century
advertising whiz, expert at spinning products (movies,
food items) to compel purchase. Leopold (Hugh Jackman)
is the gallant Duke of Albany living in 1876, about to
be forced to marry for money. When Leopold is
inadvertently whisked to 2001 by Kate's amateur
inventor ex, Stuart (Liev Schrieber, wasted in this
role), the fated couple meets. And, after predictable
personality clashes (she's too cynical, he's too
polite), they fall in love.
All this is pretty regular. Equal doses yearning,
nose-scrunching, and prat-falling, Kate is the kind of
character that Meg Ryan does well and often, and
Jackman manages the Victorian "repartee" with
appropriate insouciance. But their relationship is
considerably less interesting than what went on behind
the scenes of Kate & Leopold. Originally
scheduled to open in early 2002, the film was moved to
21 December to take advantage of a lack of
girl-skewing movies during the holiday season. Then
suddenly, after K&L had already screened for
most critics, it was pushed back to Xmas, so that
director James Mangold might remove a troubling
detail, namely, incest.
That this detail apparently escaped everyone involved
in the making and early marketing of the film is
probably more amusing to the rest of us than to those
so involved. Imagine the panic that must have hit
Miramax when word started going around, following
initial preview screenings (including one that I
attended), that Stuart's original relationship to
Leopold -- the Duke's great-great grandson -- meant
that, before he and Kate broke up, he was having sex
with his great-great grandmother. (It's worth noting
that the danger of incest is hardly news in
time-travel movies: see, for instance, Marty McFly's
fear of dating his mom in Back to the Future.)
However this dicey business eluded notice, once it
was noticed, it obviously could not stand. In
the version of Kate & Leopold that most people
will see, Stuart is just a guy, not a relative. Now
Stuart just happens to pick Leopold out of a crowd in
New York City, 1876, a moment Stuart reaches by means
of a portal (a "crack in the fabric of time!" he
exults) by literally jumping off the Brooklyn Bridge.
Apparently, he can't go back any further, as there
would be no bridge to jump off in order to get back to
his own time... but no matter. Stuart is intensely
interested in the Bridge, arriving for its christening
(adorned with prominent U.S. flag) and giggling at the
accompanying pompous, double-entendred speech: "This
mighty erection shall stand for all eternity!"
Such jolly intramale joking is extended to the
relationship (again, not familial) between Stuart and
Leopold. The latter espies the former skulking about,
first at the Bridge ceremony and then at a party where
Leopold is supposed to announce his engagement to
someone (anyone) rich. A chase across the city ensues,
involving runs across cobbled streets and rooftops, at
the end of which both men leap from the Bridge, both
landing in 2001's yucky river. Having discovered that
the Duke has devised preliminary plans for the
invention of the elevator, Stuart wisely sees it as
imperative that he get the guy back to his proper time
period. (Previously, this situation was slightly more
dire, as Leopold had to live in the 19th century in
order to serve as precursor for Stuart's existence,
but, well, that point's now moot.) He brings the
unconscious Leopold back to his apartment and his big
dog Bart, in order to figure a way back -- to the
past.
Meantime, Kate, who leads focus groups for a firm
called CRG Research, will be introduced, but not in
the way she was originally introduced. You'll see her
at her apartment (which just happens to be downstairs
from Stuart's) and at her office, feeling
uncomfortable around her smarmy boss J.J. (Bradley
Whitford), who comes on to her by dangling a promotion
before her and admiring that she's tough-minded and
bottom-line-oriented like a man. This is fine, but
it's not so clever as Kate's first first scene, set in
a movie theater during a test screening for a corny
romance. She suggests dialogue changes to make the
female lead "more likable," and deftly holds her own
when the film's director (played by Mangold himself)
tells her, "My characters are real. Movies can be
real, you know. You're sucking the life out of
American cinema!" One might suppose that this scene is
now cut because it portrays the situation in which the
film has found itself -- undergoing last minute cuts
after previews.
Now Kate's immediate problem at work is locating a
spokesperson for some fake butter product. Guess what?
Leopold is just the guy. At first, she scoffs at
Leopold's Sergeant Pepper-looking outfit and doesn't
believe Stuart's outrageous explanation about
Leopold's origins. But when Stuart falls down a
no-longer working elevator shaft, she's left in charge
of Leopold and warms to his gallantry. He also wins
over her actor brother Charlie (Breckin Meyer), who
initially admires that Leo is so relentlessly Method,
and that he has good ideas about seducing babes. You
know, like not acting all self-interested, but
actually asking her what she likes to do, quoting a
bit of poetry, sending flowers. How novel.
What makes Leopold so appealing to Kate is his sense
of chivalry. When a mugger grabs her purse near
Central Park, she gives chase, on foot, immediately
followed by Leopold, on a horse he's commandeered from
one of those buggies that go around the park. (Poor
thing -- bad enough that its legs ache from literally
pounding pavement all day, now it's tearing across the
park and leaping over park benches.) Kate is
impressed. It's at this point that she recognizes what
her assistant Darci (Natasha Lyonne) has been saying
(setting up) in the earlier part of the film -- that a
19th-century gent, much like, oh, Jane Austen's Mr.
Darcy, is the ideal mate. He stands when a lady leaves
the table and knows what flowers signify what (begonia
= danger, water lily = purity of heart, etc.).
Never mind that this guy is clueless when it comes to
actual labor or the concept of class; as long as he's
upper, he has no need to know anything more. He's such
a pleasant fellow that. When Kate is in a pickle, he
agrees to play the not-butter salesman for her. But
when he actually tastes the stuff and discovers that
it's awful, he disparages her for marketing faulty
products. For a minute, she stands up to him, and
makes the film's most important point concerning
class: she's worked hard all her life (unlike the
privileged duke), and so, she says, "I need a rest,
and if I have to sell a little pond scum to get it,
then so be it!" Not precisely Rosalind Russell, but
reasonably endearing. For about 20 seconds, trouble
looms in paradise.
The saddest part of all this is that Leopold, manly
and clever as he is (conquering muggers, inventing
elevators) appears to be such an anomaly for Kate.
Worse, her proclivities -- toward work, independence,
self-respect -- are suddenly turned inside out. This
smart, capable, ambitious woman is so unfulfilled by
the life she thinks she's chosen that she finds solace
in a man who follows rules of etiquette, not exactly
the most independent way of life. Maybe it's not the
entire century that's gone so wrong. Perhaps it's just
the business she's in, the harsh, contemptuous mass
marketing business. But hey, that's the very same
business that is trying to sell you this particular
bill of goods -- that someone as obviously bright as
Kate would want to give up her life in order to go
back in time and be someone's wife, a wife who can
wear gowns and organize teas and whatever else a
Duchess did then.
Of course, the film explains Kate's choice as a
function of love, which makes it a non-choice, a
matter of fate. But this whimsy of love across the
ages is strained, and the finale is foregone (girl
needs to get with the gender-role program). The
dynamic is part soft romantic comedy and part '40s
battle-of-the-sexes fare. Mangold has ventured into
deeper, more complex versions of these romantic-quest
waters before, in Heavy and Copland, and
so this one looks especially sappy by comparison.
Aspiring to '40s sparring, Kate & Leopold --
co-written by Mangold and Steven Rogers -- only
occasionally delivers. Most often, you know exactly
where every scene is going long before it gets
started.