+ interview with Ryan Phillippe, starring in The Way of the Gun
+ interview with Christopher McQuarrie, director of The Way of the Gun
Off the Path
"For the record, I'll call myself Mr. Parker, and my
associate will be Mr. Longbaugh." By the time Parker
(Ryan Phillippe) names himself, about three minutes
into The Way of the Gun, you've already seen him in
a brief spurt of disastrous action, and have a sense
of why he'd like to go by a pseudonym. He's a
self-styled menace, swaggering and sometimes
stumbling, perpetually exhausted and enraged. You
know all this because you've just seen Parker and his
boy Longbaugh (Benicio del Toro) fight with some
stupid guy who insists they stop leaning on his parked
car. There's no reason to fight, except the guy is
showing off for his foul-mouthed girlfriend, and
Parker and Longbaugh don't have anything else to do
that night. The pair get their asses kicked by the
guy's crew. The partners are lying on the street,
bloodied and rag-dolly, as the camera pulls out and
up, hanging over them like a vulture.
Such predatory positioning leaves little doubt as to
how this movie is going to treat its both its
characters and viewers. Parker has named them after
the real names of Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid,
which means both ways: "our" Parker and Longbaugh are
the real deal but also not. There's no real to be,
anymore. The West is long dead, and that noiry voice
over that Parker has going is world-weary all right,
but not very wise or hardcore, or even cynical: it's
so done already. He and his boy are old school
bad-guy partners, with a code and extraordinary
loyalty to one another, but they lack proper good guys
to fight: the world around them is so confused and
vile; there's no clear moral, legal, or even personal
ground. They have, as Parker puts it in
writer-director Chris (The Usual Suspects)
McQuarrie's elegant bad-guy-speak "fallen off the
path." At such a point, past crisis and past
redemption, you have no choice, Parker observes: "Keep
your life simple and you can self-sustain."
But this being a McQuarrie film, there is no such
thing as "simple." Indeed, within minutes Parker and
Longbaugh's lives are so unbelievably fucked up and
complicated that there is no chance in hell that they
will ever be able to get back to that first moment
when they're laid out on the street, a moment which,
looking back, is suddenly sublime in its simplicity.
While this moment establishes their viciousness,
aggression, and devotion to one another, it actually
sets up very little in terms of what will befall them.
All you know for sure is that something will befall
them. Something dire and harrowing and, of course,
quite off the path.
Tellingly, the plot kicks in just as Parker utters the
word "simple." A sound bridge takes you from their
unconscious bodies to the next scene, where the guys
essay rather desperately to make some bucks, by
selling their sperm (the way of the gun, indeed).
Longbaugh informs the interviewer, "I never killed a
man, that's a qualification." He's lying, of course,
he has killed men. But the fellow at the desk has no
idea of this. And at this moment you might not even
be so sure, except that you've seen Longbaugh behave
so violently for no good reason, that you can only
imagine what kind of damage he wreaks if actually
provoked. The scene works to bond the partners in
your mind, intercutting between their interviews at
the sperm bank, so their answers seem to interlock and
speak to one another, their psycho-killer psyches
alternate, like a rhythm. Each makes his case: he's
not homosexual, he's never had sex with a dead person.
And the question that neither can answer because
they're too alienated and too-early abandoned to know:
"Any history of mental illness in your family?"
It's by chance that they come upon a plan, or think
they come up with one (though, as Parker says, "A plan
is just a list of things that don't happen"). While
waiting to hear if they "passed" the interview, Parker
and Longbaugh overhear a phone call concerning a
surrogate mother, and the plan hatches. They'll
kidnap this woman who's been paid to carry a rich guy
couple's child, and demand mad cash. The surrogate
mother is Robin (Juliette Lewis), nine months into her
pregnancy and waddling hugely. The rich couple is a
gangster-businessman named Hale Chidduck (Scott
Wilson) and his icy-bitch wife Francesca (Kristen
Lehman). By the time the kidnapping occurs, you know
enough about these people to understand why Robin
might decide to take leave of her bodyguards,
supersmooth Jeffers (Taye Diggs) and young tough
Obecks (Nicky Katt), to take a chance with these
leftovers from the wild wild west. Also by this time,
you're quite aware that no good will come of any of
it. Parker and Longbaugh make their move as she's
leaving the doctor's high-rise, nylon pulled down on
their faces and guns drawn. A group of bystanders is
lolling about in the office building lobby, only
vaguely surprised to see the weapons. Or maybe
they're missing something. "Can't you people see there
are guns here?!" whines Parker, exasperated. But
civilians, by definition, can not fathom how guns work
or what they mean, the way of the gun. Even when they
do exit the building, they wait around outside to
watch the action, like it's a movie. Once the
shooting starts (which you don't even see, remaining
behind, inside the building with Robin), the civilians
become statistics, bodies left behind as the plot
moves on.
The Way of the Gun piles up a lot of bodies. The
outlaws head from the Southwest U.S. to a dusty,
worn-out Mexican border town, followed by Jeffers and
Obecks, who are in turn followed by Chidduck's ace
hitman, Sarno (James Caan), the veteran
gangster-thug-performer. Sarno describes himself as
versed in "the art of adjudication." And every other
guy understands this for what it is: he's a bagman,
cunning, experienced, honorable, not to be trusted.
Everyone knows how this bad business will end and each
has a mix of reasons pride, money, boredom,
bloodlust, greed for not turning back. Such
inexorable motion doesn't require thinking through.
When asked who between Parker and Longbaugh is
the "brains of the operation," Longbaugh answers, "To
tell you the truth, I don't think this is a brains
kind of operation." The machinery grinds on.
The ground-up object, of course, is Robin, who
becomes, quite literally, meat. During a particularly
gruesome and lengthy finale, while the men gather to
point guns at one another, her worn-down body
collapses in a Mexican brothel, where her doctor Allen
Painter (Dylan Kussman), is forced to perform a
Cesarean. Robin's passed out from the pain, and
Painter's standing over the bed, his hands all up
inside her bloody gut, a couple of thug corpses strewn
about the room. It's an ugly scene, made uglier by the
fact that the gunmen just keep at their business.
The ugliness makes a point, of course, having to do
with the effects of violence, its costs and purports.
And here at this clear point of brutality and
hatefulness where the film, so ambiguously and
awkwardly named, poses what may be its central
question. What is the "way of the gun"?
Break it down: Can it be that the many measures of
meanness, immorality, and chaos that have brought
Parker and Longbaugh, Jeffers and Obecks, Sarno and
Robin, to this moment come down to genre? Do the
movie's generic roots its patent investments in
action flicks, thrillers, gangster movies, Westerns,
and films noirs make it just another genre picture
or a thoughtful challenge to these familiar (not to
say stale) configurations? Where and how does a text
transgress or challenge conventions, rather than
rehearsing or even reframing them? Is The Way of the Gun "off the path"? Or is "off the path" -- once it's
named as such just another path to be on, a way to
position oneself against a more traditional path? Is
Parker self-delusional instead of insightful? Can he
be both at the same time, or does it even matter,
given that he is, after all, a fictional character?
Is the "way" of this film just another scandalous and
generally offensive path? Does that very offensiveness
make the path (or the decision to take it) subversive,
because it makes you feel uncomfortable rather than
complacent, titillated, or thrilled by the violence
you've paid money to see? And does the "way" involve
responsibility and self-awareness? And, I suppose, you
might as well, ask, how does it matter, and to whom?