Whipped
Director: Peter M. Cohen
Cast: Amanda Peet, Brian Van Holt, Jonathan Abrahams, Zorie Barber, Judah Domke
(Destination Films, 2000) Rated: R
by Cynthia Fuchs
PopMatters Film and TV Editor
e-mail this article
Pussy
"Everybody fucks everybody. It's the nature of the
beast."
With these winning voiced-over words, Whipped
introduces its protagonist and primary object, Mia
(Amanda Peet). And while she's waxing profound and
cynical on human relations, you're watching one of the
three guys who will be wooing her during the next 88
minutes, Brad (Brian Van Holt). He's on the street in
New York, unable to get a cab, becoming increasingly
frustrated. Cut to a scene in a bar, where Brad
addresses the camera: "I can provide a woman with
pretty much everything she wants," he says. "Sausage
included."
Sigh.
Written, directed, and produced by first-timer Peter
M. Cohen, Whipped is plainly pleased with its drippy
cynicism. The premise is this: Brad and his three best
friends Zeke (Zorie Barber), Jonathan (Jonathan
Abrahams), and Eric (Judah Domke) meet regularly
for Sunday "brunches," during which they brag and
kvetch about their sex lives, what they call
"scamming" (translation: getting over into girls'
pants). Three of the guys are single, and so, while
the make fun of chubby-geeky-whiny Eric's married
status (you never see the wife, Lorraine), they also
dream of the perfect girl, that special someone who's
just waiting to be swept off her feet by the male's
eminent charms, who's not merely a "gorilla on
Ecstasy" (an especially aggressive lover) or Hoover
Hannah (apparently famous for giving Brad a five-hour
blowjob), but able to hold a conversation about the
male's particular area of interest in these cases,
stocks (Brad), screenplays (Zeke), and masturbation
(Jonathan). They also instruct their designated
dork-boy, Jonathan, in attaining the "untease-able
dick," which means an attitude that allows you to
"fuck and forget." In order to attain this nirvana of
cynicism, you must be burned by some bad babe, and
poor Jonathan simply hasn't been there yet.
This is because Jonathan has slept with only nine
women in his life (when he confesses this to the
camera, he hopefully describes himself as "picky," but
his big-talking pals obviously consider him
"retarded"). Jonathan's lack of experience becomes his
one-joke characterization, daily masturbation. It's
never clear what he does to pay rent (but then again,
who cares). Jonathan's buddies do have jobs, or at
least occupations which grant them means to scam. Brad
is some kind of Wall Street person, though you never
see him at work, just "out with the guys from
work."And Zeke is some kind of writer, though you
never see him writing, hanging out in a "beatnik
cafe," reading books in a corner and affecting
"enigmatic," artiste-y mannerisms that somehow appeal
to the chicks he thinks he wants to pick up (or who
pick him up and then steal his stereo and tv: now
isn't that a funny punchline!).
The boys' diner meetings provide the film with a basic
structure, such that the segments are numbered and
titled, thusly: "Week 3: Mayhem," "Week 6: Whipped."
You might think this device turns more tedious than
clever, and you'd be right. But it's not only the
structural and visual repetition that's annoying (they
always meet in the same booth and the camera set-ups
are all the same), it's also the characters' lack of
for lack of a better word development
JonathanZekeEricandBrad's conversations cover and
re-cover the same thematic ground, that is, who got
some that weekend, how and where. I've asked around,
and been informed that guys like this do exist, but no
one I've spoken with admits to knowing one personally.
They perform for each other (see also the requisite
pickup basketball game, as the four demonstrate that
white men can't jump or score or anything else: this
would be the "physical" humor sequence). And, sigh
again, this leads to the not very subtle suggestion
that they share a certain homoerotic bond, of which
they are deathly afraid. Whenever anyone for
instance, the domesticated, Cosmo-reading Eric
mentions something about achieving better performance
(e.g., drinking apple juice to make for a better
tasting blowjob, using kitchen appliances to enhance a
woman's pleasure) the others dismiss him
immediately, as it's girly and/or gay to be too
concerned with what a woman "wants," except as this
leads specifically to getting what you want. The goal,
after all, is to be a perfectly self-fixated guy.
No surprise, all this chatter-and-chest-thumping leads
to competition over one girl, the aforementioned Mia.
While the brunch routine ostensibly affords the guys a
sense of security, it also wears a little thin for
viewers who have already seen it in
ensemble-boy-bonding movies like Diner, Swingers,
or The Tao of Steve, not to mention that so-stale
business where protagonists confess their bad or
downright silly ideas about how to pork, bone, and
spank their own monkeys to the camera, as in such
classic films as, oh, Body Shots, which,
coincidentally, also stars our girl Amanda Peet.
Peet's Mia is energetic and pretty and very special,
even if this really is the boys' movie and she only
shows up at moments when she can best illustrate their
anxieties, concerns, and "issues." While the film's
general organization three guys competing for one
woman, all knowing about one another, all showing up
at her apartment at the same time is pretty much
directly ripped off from Spike Lee's groundbreaking
She's Gotta Have It, here the focus is not on the
she, but the three he's (who would be derived from
Diner, Swingers, etc., etc.). Still, the film's
marketing campaign is plainly focused on Peet, who has
the box office clout to open the film. It appears
that, since her "breakout" performance as Bruce
Willis's hitperson trainee in The Whole Nine Yards,
Peet has generated enough buzz to have gotten
Whipped off the shelf, where it has lingered for
some time (and, no doubt, the fact that it is opening
against the unpreviewed Highlander: Endgame likely
has something to do with the choice of this particular
weekend for its release).
Mia appears in each man's fantasies and in person,
telling them as a group, so very Nola-Darling-like,
that she doesn't want to choose among them, that she
fancies them all equally, though for different
reasons. Blah blah blah: she shares an interest in
Brad's stock quotes, Zeke's screenwriting, and
Jonathan's masturbation, which leads to one lame
Trainspotting ripoff, as Jonathan must recover Mia's
vibrator from a shit-filled toilet (tired!). And
Mia/Peet is, as the trailers underline, mightily cute
and kinetic (though the much-rotated scene where she
performs the "Who's your daddy!?" line for her
girlfriends comes way late in the proceedings, and
leads exactly nowhere). Mia's incredible ability to
find something to enjoy in each of these idiots
piled on top of her voice-over introduction to the
film doesn't leave much suspense as to her own
cynicism and performative prowess. Still, the movie
pretends for a bit that she might be sincere in her
affections, or at least it allows each of the male
characters to think that he is the Chosen One, leading
to contemplations of marrying and/or shacking up with
the lovely Mia, of making her his very own.
It would seem that Whipped wants to comment shrewdly
on the state of male-female, and more to the point,
male-male, relationships. But its insights men and
women lie to one another and themselves, women talk
about penis size amongst themselves are pretty much
played out. Jeez, can it be so interesting still
to ponder the notion that women can play so-called
guys' games better than men do? Is it amusing to watch
men behave badly and be punished for it? And is it
news that the socio-political system "Everybody
fucks everybody" remains in place throughout all of
these machinations? Let's hope not.
|